Oracle Fusion Cloud · HCM · Modern Best Practice · Implementation Deliverables

Oracle Modern Best Practice, and the documents that carry an HCM Cloud implementation.

This reference has two halves. First it explains OMBP (Oracle Modern Best Practice) — Oracle's library of optimized, technology-enabled business processes distilled from thousands of delivery projects, and the tooling (Cloud Success Navigator, Starter Configuration) that puts it in front of a project team. Then it walks the documents you actually create when you implement Oracle HCM Cloud the OMBP way: the requirements and design set, the build/configuration/data set, and the test/cutover/go-live set. For each document you get what it is, who owns it, and where in the lifecycle it lands.

00How to Use This Sheet

The shape of the whole thing — how OMBP, the delivery method, and the document set fit together.

Reference Map — OMBP & HCM Implementation Documents
FrameworkOracle Modern Best Practice (OMBP) — optimized business processes for Oracle Fusion Cloud
ProductOracle Fusion Cloud HCM — Core HR, Absence, Payroll, Time & Labor, Talent, etc.
Method it sits inTrue Cloud Method (TCM) — Oracle embeds OMBP into TCM; many partners also draw on OUM
SectionsOracle Modern Best Practice · Method & Phases · Requirements & Design Docs · Build, Config & Data Docs · Test, Cutover & Go-Live
Total items32 items across 5 groups
How they connectOMBP gives the target process; Fit-Gap compares it to the client's needs; Design docs (BRD → FDD → TDD) record decisions; the Config Workbook + data + integrations build it; test scripts + cutover prove and deliver it
Reference vs producedSection 1 (OMBP) and Section 2 (method) are what you reference & follow; Sections 3–5 are the artifacts you actually write and sign off
Learn as you goTick Learned on each card; your progress saves automatically on this device

01Oracle Modern Best Practice

The framework itself — what OMBP is, what makes it "modern," how it shows up for HCM, and the Navigator tooling that delivers it to a project.

1.1
OMBP — Oracle Modern Best Practice

A published library of common business processes that Oracle has optimized to take advantage of the latest Fusion Cloud applications and technologies. They're distilled from analysis of 10,000+ delivery projects — both successful and unsuccessful — then reviewed by Oracle experts and published for public reference on oracle.com.

Crucially, an OMBP is not a click-by-click application flow. It's a digital business process — an end-to-end depiction of how a process (say, absence through to payroll) should run when it fully leverages Oracle technology. You use it as the target picture to design toward.

Where used: Design phase → the "to-be" process you validate client requirements against
Good to know: OMBPs exist across ERP, EPM, SCM, HCM and CX, plus industry-specific sets (banking, healthcare, higher education, public sector, and more).
1.2
The Four Characteristics of OMBP

Oracle describes OMBP with a handful of defining traits. The ones worth memorising:

  • Dynamic — updated regularly to match evolving customer needs and new application capabilities (tracked against quarterly release versions like 25D, 26A).
  • Trusted — every process is validated and tested by Oracle experts, not theoretical.
  • Modern / technology-enabled — built to exploit AI/ML, analytics, mobile and more, rather than digitising old manual steps.
  • End-to-end — spans departments to remove silos, connecting global process owners to real business outcomes.
Where used: Positioning & scoping conversations → explaining why to adopt standard over legacy processes
1.3
Enabling Technologies

What makes a best practice "modern" is the set of digital enablers embedded into each process step. Each OMBP diagram tags which of these it leverages:

CloudMobileAnalyticsSocialAI / MLIoTBig DataBlockchainAR / VR

In HCM, the ones you meet most are AI/ML (recommendations, predictive attrition, resume screening), Analytics (embedded dashboards, OTBI), and Mobile (self-service on any device).

Where used: Reading an OMBP flow → enabler icons show which technology powers each activity
1.4
OMBP for HCM — Hire to Retire

For Human Capital Management, OMBP maps the whole Hire-to-Retire employee lifecycle into optimized sub-processes — for example Recruit to Onboard, Absence to Payroll, Time to Pay, Goal to Reward, and Talent Review to Succession. Each shows the AI- and analytics-enabled path through Core HR, Absence, Payroll, Time & Labor and Talent.

Where used: HCM design workshops → align each module's setup to its OMBP process
Tie-in: Oracle also offers a HCM Process Essentials certification built around these OMBP flows — useful for consultants proving process fluency.
1.5
CSN — Cloud Success Navigator

Oracle's guided platform that brings OMBP into the project instead of leaving it on a website. Cloud Success Navigator lets a team browse OMBP processes by industry and functional area, open each activity to see its Key Features (with effort/impact indicators), and align their implementation to quality benchmarks at each stage of the cloud journey.

Where used: Home page → Featured → "Oracle Modern Best Practice (OMBP) and Key Features"
1.6
Starter Configuration

A predefined configuration of Oracle Cloud Applications, aligned to OMBP, that Oracle can deploy into a customer's test environment. It ships with sample master and transactional data and predetermined usernames, so the team can see the best-practice process running from day one and configure by tailoring it, rather than building from an empty pod.

Where used: Early Design/Prototype → requested via CSN, replicated into a chosen test environment
Watch for: Starter Config is a learning and design accelerator — you still add your own enterprise structures, legislative rules and real data through the normal document-driven build.
1.7
Where OMBP Fits in the Cloud Journey

Oracle positions OMBP as usable at every stage of the journey — to educate stakeholders, demonstrate what new capabilities enable, plan the path to the target solution, and benchmark scope, progress and benefits. In practice, on an HCM project it anchors the design phase: it's the reference "to-be" you hold your Fit-Gap and configuration decisions against.

Where used: Plan → Design → Validate → Operate (as reference throughout)

02Method & Phases

The delivery methodology OMBP lives inside, and the lifecycle stages that decide which document you're writing when.

2.1
TCM — True Cloud Method

Oracle's own implementation methodology for Fusion Cloud. It's built around configuration over customization, standard-first design, and iterative prototyping — and it embeds OMBP as the process foundation. TCM is the method Oracle-led and many partner-led Cloud HCM projects follow today.

Where used: Project governance → sets the phase gates and deliverable list
2.2
OUM — Oracle Unified Method

Oracle's full-lifecycle, phased method that predates the cloud-specific TCM and is still widely referenced by system integrators. It defines the classic work-product library (requirements, analysis, design, build, test, transition, production). Many document names consultants still use — RD.xxx, MD.050, MD.070, CV.xxx, TE.040 — trace back to OUM (and its predecessor, AIM).

Where used: Deliverable naming → templates & work-product codes on many HCM projects
Note: Whether a project says "TCM" or "OUM," the documents in Sections 3–5 are broadly the same. The method decides the ceremony; the artifacts stay recognisable.
2.3
Fit-Gap — Fit-Gap Analysis

The core analysis activity: take each required business process and compare it against Oracle Fusion's standard functionality (the OMBP target). Every requirement is classified as a fit (standard covers it), a gap (needs an extension, workaround, or process change), producing the backlog that drives every design document downstream.

Where used: Design phase workshops → feeds the Fit-Gap Document (3.2) and RICEFW list (3.7)
Watch for: gaps captured too late are a top cause of scope creep and overrun — nail the Fit-Gap before you build.
2.4
CRP — Conference Room Pilot

A structured walkthrough where the team demonstrates the configured system to the business against real scenarios, to validate that the design matches requirements before deeper build. Projects usually run several rounds (CRP1, CRP2…), each tightening the configuration. Each CRP has its own scenario scripts and captured feedback.

Where used: Configure/Validate phase → iterative sign-off checkpoints
2.5
The Phases — Plan to Operate

A typical Cloud HCM lifecycle, and which documents each phase produces:

  1. Plan / Prepare — project charter, scope, instance strategy.
  2. Design / Architect — BRD, Fit-Gap, FDD, TDD, Security & Solution design (Section 3).
  3. Configure / Build — Config Workbook, data conversion, integrations, fast formulas, reports (Section 4).
  4. Validate / Test — CRP, SIT and UAT scripts and results (Section 5).
  5. Deploy / Transition — cutover plan, go-live checklist, training (Section 5).
  6. Operate / Run — hypercare, SOPs, and continuous adoption of new quarterly features.
Where used: The whole engagement → each phase gates the next

03Requirements & Design Documents

The "what and how" artifacts — where requirements are captured and every configuration and build decision is recorded and signed off.

3.1
BRD — Business Requirements Document

The signed-off statement of what the business needs — process requirements, rules, volumes, and success criteria, gathered in requirement workshops. It's the baseline every later document traces back to. On OMBP-led projects, requirements are gathered solution-first: you demonstrate the standard process, then capture where the client genuinely differs.

Where used: Design phase → owned by functional lead / BA, signed by business process owners
Traceability: good BRDs number every requirement so it can be linked forward to a design (FDD) and a test case (UAT). Regulated clients (banking, healthcare) require this end-to-end trace.
3.2
Fit-Gap Analysis Document

The written output of the Fit-Gap activity (2.3): a register of each requirement marked Fit / Gap, with the recommended disposition for gaps — standard config, a personalization/extension, a manual workaround, or a business-process change. It's what turns "what the client asked for" into "what we're going to build."

Where used: Design phase → drives the RICEFW inventory and the FDD backlog
3.3
FDD / MD.050 — Functional Design Document

The most critical build document: it defines how each requirement will be implemented functionally — the setup choices, business rules, approval flows, and expected behavior. In HCM it's written per area (e.g. an FDD for Absence plans, one for Payroll elements, one for an interface). The technical team builds from it; testers verify against it. MD.050 is its classic OUM/AIM code.

Where used: Design phase → one FDD per RICEFW object or configuration area
Why it matters: the FDD is where the OMBP target meets the client's real rules — get it right and configuration, testing, and support all become straightforward.
3.4
TDD / MD.070 — Technical Design Document

The technical companion to the FDD, written for anything custom — integrations, extracts, BIP/OTBI reports, fast formulas, and extensions. It specifies the technical how: data sources and mappings, logic, tools (OIC, HCM Extracts, HDL), error handling, and performance. Written by the technical consultant/developer. MD.070 is its classic code.

Where used: Design phase → one TDD per interface / report / extension
3.5
Solution Design / Blueprint

The enterprise-level design that sits above the module FDDs: enterprise structures (legal entities, LDGs, business units), the module footprint, the integration landscape, and the instance/environment strategy. It's the architectural view that keeps individual designs consistent and prevents shared foundational objects from being designed twice.

Where used: Early Design phase → owned by the solution architect
Foundational: enterprise-structure design done here is notoriously expensive to change later — validate it thoroughly before build.
3.6
Security Design Document

The design of the role-based access model: which job roles, duty roles, data roles and security profiles exist, who gets them, and how segregation of duties is enforced. In HCM this also governs sensitive data access (health, compensation, personal data), so it's where compliance rules like data-privacy restrictions get implemented.

Where used: Design phase → built in the Security Console; owned by the security consultant
3.7
RICEFW — Extension Inventory

The master tracker of everything beyond vanilla configuration: Reports, Interfaces, Conversions, Extensions, Forms/Fast Formulas, and Workflows. Each row links to its FDD and TDD and carries status, owner, and complexity. It's the single list that tells a PM how much custom work remains.

Where used: Design → Build → Test → the running catalogue of custom objects
OMBP tie-in: fewer RICEFW items = closer to standard = easier quarterly updates. Every gap you can close with standard OMBP config keeps this list short.

04Build, Config & Data Documents

The artifacts that capture the actual system build — setup values, migrated data, integrations, rules, and reports.

4.1
Configuration Workbook BR.100

The record of every setup value applied in the application — often a workbook mirroring the Functional Setup Manager (FSM) task lists. It captures what was set, in which environment, so configuration can be reproduced across pods (Dev → Test → Prod) and audited later. BR.100 is the legacy name still used for it on many projects.

Where used: Configure phase → Setup and Maintenance (FSM) → documented per offering/task
Tip: pair the workbook with Configuration Package export/import in FSM to move setup between environments consistently, then keep the workbook as the human-readable record.
4.2
Data Conversion Strategy CV

The plan for moving legacy data into HCM: what objects convert (workers, assignments, balances, elements…), the field-level mapping, cleansing rules, load sequence, and reconciliation approach. Split across a strategy document and mapping sheets (classic codes CV.010 / CV.040). Data readiness is a top cause of go-live slips, so this starts early.

Where used: Build phase → owned jointly by data lead and functional SMEs
Watch for: starting conversion late with dirty legacy data — cleanse in parallel with design, not at the end.
4.3
HDL — Data Loader Templates

The concrete load artifacts behind the conversion strategy. HCM Data Loader (HDL) uses pipe-delimited .dat files with METADATA lines defining each object's attributes; the design records which business objects, keys (user keys vs source keys), and file structures are used. The Spreadsheet Loader (HSDL) is the lighter, spreadsheet-based alternative for smaller loads.

Where used: Build & Cutover → bulk load and mass updates via HDL / HSDL
4.4
Integration Design Document

The specification for each inbound/outbound interface between HCM and other systems (benefits providers, payroll third parties, finance, IdM). It defines the source/target, tool (OIC, HCM Extracts, web services), frequency, field mapping, and error handling — effectively a TDD focused on integration. Often tracked collectively in an interface inventory.

Where used: Build phase → one design per interface; owned by integration developer
4.5
Fast Formula Design

Documentation for each Fast Formula — Oracle's rule language for element calculations, absence accruals, eligibility, proration, skip rules, and validation. The design records the formula's purpose, inputs (database items), logic, and return values, so the rule can be reviewed, tested, and maintained rather than living only in the pod.

Where used: Build phase → Payroll, Absence, Compensation & Benefits rules
4.6
Reports Inventory — BIP / OTBI Specs

The catalogue and design of custom reporting: BI Publisher (BIP) pixel-perfect outputs (payslips, statutory reports) and OTBI analyses and dashboards for operational reporting. Each entry specifies the subject area/data model, columns, filters, layout, bursting, and security. Standard OMBP dashboards cover a lot, so this inventory should list only genuine gaps.

Where used: Build phase → BIP data models & OTBI subject areas; feeds UAT reporting tests

05Test, Cutover & Go-Live

The artifacts that prove the build works, move it into production safely, and keep it running after go-live.

5.1
Test Strategy & Test Plan

The umbrella documents for validation: the Test Strategy sets the approach, types (unit, SIT, UAT, regression, performance, parallel payroll), environments and entry/exit criteria; the Test Plan schedules cycles, resources, and defect management. Together they make testing systematic rather than ad hoc.

Where used: Validate phase → owned by test lead; gates entry into UAT and go-live
5.2
SIT — System Integration Test Scripts

Step-by-step scripts that validate end-to-end process flows across modules and interfaces — e.g. hire in Core HR → absence → payroll → outbound interface to a third party. Run by the project team, SIT confirms the pieces work together, not just individually. Each script lists steps, test data, and expected results.

Where used: Validate phase → executed by consultants/testers before UAT
5.3
UAT — User Acceptance Test Scripts

Business-owned scripts where real end users validate the system against their requirements using realistic scenarios, and formally accept it. UAT sign-off is the primary gate to go-live. Scripts trace back to the BRD, closing the requirement-to-acceptance loop. (TE.040 is the classic script code.)

Where used: Validate phase → executed by business users; sign-off authorizes deployment
Traceability again: BRD → FDD → UAT script is the chain auditors check. If a requirement has no UAT case, it was never truly proven.
5.4
Cutover Plan / Runbook

The minute-by-minute sequence of tasks to move to production: final data loads, config migration, validations, approvals, and the fallback/rollback plan — each task with an owner, dependency, duration and timestamp. It's usually rehearsed in a mock cutover before the real one so timing and gaps are known in advance.

Where used: Deploy phase → owned by PM / cutover manager; executed over the go-live window
Watch for: an untested runbook. Always do at least one mock cutover — go-live day is not the time to discover a step takes four hours.
5.5
Go-Live Checklist

The go/no-go readiness list confirming everything is in place before switching on: data reconciled, security assigned, integrations verified, UAT signed off, training delivered, support model ready. Each item has an owner and a status, and the whole list is reviewed at the go/no-go decision meeting.

Where used: Deploy phase → reviewed at the go/no-go gate
5.6
Training Material / User Guides DO.070

The end-user enablement set: role-based user guides, quick reference cards, and training workbooks — increasingly delivered in-app through Oracle Guided Learning (OGL) so help sits inside the Redwood screens. Good training is what turns a technically correct go-live into actual adoption. (DO.070 is the classic user-guide code.)

Where used: Deploy phase → delivered before go-live; owned by OCM / training lead
5.7
Hypercare & SOP Documents

The post-go-live set: the hypercare plan (heightened support right after launch — issue triage, SLAs, escalation), and SOPs / operational runbooks for recurring tasks (payroll runs, quarterly-update regression, period processing). This is where the project hands over to a sustainable run model.

Where used: Operate phase → support team & process owners
OMBP tie-in: Oracle's quarterly updates keep shipping new OMBP-aligned features — SOPs should include a regular "review the release notes and adopt what fits" step so the solution keeps improving.

06Contact Us

Want the full Oracle HCM Cloud implementation course — OMBP-led design, documentation, and end-to-end Core HR, Absence, Payroll & Time? Reach out to Future Proof Trainings through any of the channels below.